A national newspaper recently reported an academic study
into religion and science. The study was
a collaborative effort by psychologists at two universities, one in Britain and
one in the USA, and it concluded that countries which tend to be strongly
religious tend not to perform well in the teaching of mathematics and science
at school.
I am aware that newspaper reports are often misleading, and
so I recently took the time to speak with one of the academics involved in the
study to find out more.
First, it appears that the authors of the report relied in
part on a survey of attitudes to religion which they themselves did not
compile. This survey ranks eighty-two
countries as to how strongly religious people in those countries tend to
be. Of the twelve deemed most religious,
only two are predominantly Christian countries, with the other ten being Muslim
countries. Of the twelve deemed the least
religious, almost all are predominantly Christian countries.
The authors discuss a displacement hypothesis, whereby
school pupils spend time learning about religion instead of learning about science
and mathematics. Obviously this
hypothesis applies equally to other subjects.
Time spent studying a foreign language is time not spent studying
science or mathematics.
Also, time alone is no guarantee of quality. Half an hour spent in a classroom with a good
teacher is surely more valuable than an hour spent in a classroom with an
inadequate teacher.
In other words, this academic study appears to be so vague
in its findings as to be of very little value.
If the authors would like to carry out further research, then maybe they
could give us some more significant insights, but I see little reason to respond
enthusiastically to a study which apparently treats all religions the
same. They are not all the same.
No comments:
Post a Comment