Free flights home for foreign crooks

Fifty police officers this morning arrested sixty-three Romanians who had been living rough in central London, and who had been linked to various crimes.  Twenty of them have accepted free flights back to Romania.

First, I wonder if their removal has anything to do with the rich people living nearby.  Would they have been removed if they had been bedding down on a council estate?

Second, giving these people free flights home seems to be an admission that Romanians can come to this country and steal or swindle their way to a free airline ticket.  Still, this is what the British people vote for, and therefore presumably what they want.

Catholics, stand by your Polish brother

A Polish man called Piotr Majchrowicz is in trouble with the General Pharmaceutical Council for daring to voice his religious beliefs in the workplace.

At the last general election, the people of Blyth voted overwhelmingly for political parties which support open door immigration from eastern Europe.  You don't need to be a genius to work out that that means more Roman Catholics in Britain. Therefore we should not be surprised if some immigrants express disgust at abortion.

Most people in this country who call themselves Christians are a right bunch of door mats. Why??!!??

Roman Catholics, take a stand.  Shout out your support for the courageous Piotr Majchrowicz.  In fact, anyone who goes to church - of whatever denomination - should call upon their church leaders to speak out against the communist persecution of a pious Christian.

This hate speech shames Britain

We have to be careful what we say in this pre-communist nation of ours.  Speak out against immigration or Islam, and you could find yourself being arrested and intimidated by the police for thought crime.  It is illegal in the UK to incite racial or religious hatred, which is of course an attack on free speech, but the communists don't care.

The test for religious hatred is more restrictive than the test for racial hatred.  Any remark about race that can be deemed insulting can be classed as inciting racial hatred, whereas a remark has to be deemed threatening to be classed as inciting religious hatred.

If we accept that it is right to have laws about inciting hatred, then why can't we just have one law of inciting hatred with just one test?  Why should religious or racial hatred be treated any differently from political hatred or occupational hatred?

David Cameron was not arrested for inciting hatred when he famously made a nasty remark about UKIP supporters.  Similarly anyone can make an insulting remark about lawyers or estate agents without fear of being arrested.  But if you dare make an insulting remark about immigrants, then watch your back.

Today a national newspaper is making insulting remarks about a family of eight who live in a small flat.  Yes, go on - be nasty about them you cowards.  They can't hit back at you.  Your despicable hate speech will not land you in trouble with the law, and I don't suppose they can afford a libel suit.

If you care about the future of your country, then NEVER buy a newspaper which incites hatred of unlucky people.

A polite message regarding Westminster City Council

A central London council has demanded the Romanian government sends its own police to Britain to deal with rough-sleepers from their country who are setting up camp in the capital.

Westminster Council says the problem is costing the taxpayer £500,000 a year with around 60 immigrants currently bedding down in Hyde Park and next to Marble Arch on Park Lane. 

These gangs are being blamed for crime and anti-social behaviour including pickpocketing, cashpoint fraud, and street scams.

How many councillors on Westminster City Council are or ever have been members of political parties which have sensible policies on migration?

How many residents of Westminster are members of a political party which has sensible policies on migration?

If you support one of the three main parties, then go to Hyde Park, and gaze upon the fruits of your wickedness.

Four YT channels

Here are four YouTube channels which I recommend you spend some time on.

In each case I am not directing you towards any one video, and neither do I necessarily endorse the contents of videos:

David Duke

Brother Nathanael

Truthwillout1001

Histroika

Does the High Street have a future?

I live in a town with a large supermarket on the edge of the town centre.  So far so normal.  It also has a thriving main shopping street, which is not quite so normal these days.  There are charity shops, but not a huge number.  There are chain stores, but there are also independent shops and eateries.

Nevertheless many towns are not as lucky.  The enemies of the traditional high street are out of town shopping centres, internet shopping, and the shortage or lack of free parking.  The rise of internet shopping is not perhaps something governments can do much about, but governments can encourage local councils to provide free parking and also to say no to out of town developments.

If you want to save your high street, then maybe you should join a political party which actually wants to save it.

So who did plant the bomb in Tipton?

Readers of The British Resistance site will perhaps have read about the recent bombing of a mosque in Tipton.  Some of the people who have left comments have implied that the bombing may be a hoax.  This of course may be true.  It is quite possible that someone connected with the mosque detonated the bomb at a time when it was unlikely to harm anyone.  It is also curious that the bomb was planted on a day when prayers had been postponed by an hour.

Nevertheless I remain firmly of the belief that this bomb was planted by a non-Muslim. As no one was killed or even injured, the bomber's trial will probably attract very little press interest.  Whatever the bomber has to say for himself (or herself) will largely go unheard.

Whatever you think if Islam, the plain fact is that bombing mosques is a non-starter.  Try joining a political party instead.